Search Results for: Jennifer Doudna

Live Blogging #GeneEditSummit Day 1 Post #2: State of the Science, #CRISPR

Human-gene-editing-science-session-small

Now we hear from the scientists on the front lines of CRISPR, covered in this post #2 of the Human Gene Editing Meeting. You can read Post #1 here. Jennifer Doudna starts off the big human gene editing science session on the current state of the human gene editing science and CRISPR. She gave an […]

Live Blogging #GeneEditSummit Day 1 Post #2: State of the Science, #CRISPR Read More »

Live Blogging NAS Human Gene Editing Summit: #GeneEditSummit

Jennifer-Doudna

The National Academy of Sciences (NAS)  summit on Human Gene Editing will begin in a few days on December 1 in Washington, D.C. This summit is in part the extension of discussions that started at a more informal meeting on CRISPR earlier this year in Napa organized by Jennifer Doudna and colleagues. The NAS meeting

Live Blogging NAS Human Gene Editing Summit: #GeneEditSummit Read More »

Perspectives on Hinxton Human Germline Modification Statement

Hinxton-Group

The international stem cell policy and ethics think tank, the Hinxton Group, weighed in yesterday on heritable human genetic modification with a new policy statement. The Hinxton statement is in many ways in agreement with the Baltimore, et al. Nature paper proposing a “prudent path forward” for human germline genetic modification, which came out of

Perspectives on Hinxton Human Germline Modification Statement Read More »

Why interview Steven Pinker on my blog if I strongly disagree with him?

blog-ethos

Earlier this week I posted an interview with Steven Pinker on CRISPR, human germline modification, and bioethics. With only a few exceptions, I strongly disagree with Pinker’s philosophy in these areas and I knew going into the interview that his answers would likely go against my own views. I also expected the interview would anger

Why interview Steven Pinker on my blog if I strongly disagree with him? Read More »

Steven Pinker interview: case against bioethocrats & CRISPR germline ban

Steven-Pinker

CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing technology is red-hot right now and I’ve been doing interviews with various thought leaders on it, which today includes Steven Pinker. This technology has great power for research in the lab and there are hypothetical transformative clinical applications of CRISPR too. The latter efforts could include experimental attempts at reversal of disease-causing

Steven Pinker interview: case against bioethocrats & CRISPR germline ban Read More »

Nita Farahany Interview on Human Germline Modification: Defining A Road Forward

Nita-Farahany

The topic of heritable human genetic modification has been heating up recently. Prominent scientists, ethicists, and legal scholars have being weighing in, and there is a range of attitudes. Some favor a complete, moratorium including even lab work, while on the other end of the spectrum there are those who have a more liberal perspective. Many

Nita Farahany Interview on Human Germline Modification: Defining A Road Forward Read More »

Congress: FDA should consult religious experts on embryo CRISPR

Crystal_Structure_of_Cas9_in_Complex_with_Guide_RNA_and_Target_DNA

The US Congress recently held its first hearing on human germline genetic modification. The meeting included CRISPR-Cas9 pioneer Jennifer Doudna (see video here) on the panel. See image of Cas9 structure from Wikipedia. CRISPR-Cas9 is a powerful, strikingly efficient tool for genetic engineering of cells and whole organisms. Now Republican congressional leaders have included a

Congress: FDA should consult religious experts on embryo CRISPR Read More »

Concerns surface on Chinese paper on genetic modification of human embryos

GM-human-embryo-review

The paper that came out Wednesday from a research group in China reporting the first genetic modification of human embryos has sparked a lot of discussion. Some concerns about this paper have surfaced. 2-day review? The paper (HT to John Borghi) was in review only from March 30-April 1 — so at most 48 hours. Really? That certainly

Concerns surface on Chinese paper on genetic modification of human embryos Read More »