Search Results for: he jiankui

New human genome editing (HHGE) academy report: solid, but key gaps

The-International-Commission-on-the-Clinical-Use-of-Human-Germline-Genome-Editing-HHGE

Something called, “The International Commission on the Clinical Use of Human Germline Genome Editing” has issued a new report on heritable human genome editing (HHGE). The Commission was convened by the U.S. National Academy of Medicine, the U.S. National Academy of Sciences, and the U.K.’s Royal Society. This post is my initial take on the summary of […]

New human genome editing (HHGE) academy report: solid, but key gaps Read More »

B+ on my report card on my 20 stem cell predictions for 2019

stem-cell-crystal-ball-predictions-1

Last year around this time I took my annual plunge to make 20 predictions for the coming year for the stem cell and regenerative medicine field. I even made a crystal ball graphic to highlight the complexity of the stem cell ecosystem into which these predictions were embedded (see image) for 2019. How’d I do?

B+ on my report card on my 20 stem cell predictions for 2019 Read More »

CRISPR baby moratorium grows likely with rising tide of support including from biotech

CRISPR-gene-edit-vs-mutation-1

Trying to make a CRISPR baby any time soon would be a really bad idea. How bad? Last December 3rd I penned a piece for STAT News arguing for a moratorium on the heritable use of CRISPR in humans. This potential future, radical application of “gene editing” is now often colloquially referred to as “CRISPR

CRISPR baby moratorium grows likely with rising tide of support including from biotech Read More »

Counterpoints to Lovell-Badge & Daley’s CRISPR baby rationales

CRISPR-baby

Two prominent scientists, Robin Lovell-Badge and George Daley, have been amongst the most outspoken proponents of leaving the door open to heritable human genetic modification via CRISPR. While they each have articulated their reasons in somewhat different ways at times, their core reasons arguing in favor of future heritable CRISPR appear largely the same. In

Counterpoints to Lovell-Badge & Daley’s CRISPR baby rationales Read More »

Context for my Nature piece on redefining “gene edit” to be more precise

CRISPR-gene-edit-vs-mutation-1

When I say “gene edit” or “genome editing”, what’s the first thing that pops in your mind? It will depend on who you are. For many lay people until a few weeks ago when the world heard about He Jiankui‘s claim of CRISPR’d babies they may not have had anything pop in their heads when

Context for my Nature piece on redefining “gene edit” to be more precise Read More »

Why CRISPR baby production (if it happened) was unethical & dangerous

Jiankui-He-who-claims-CRISPR-baby-production

Reports are out that a scientist in China has been working to make a CRISPR baby for some time and supposedly has made twin genetically modified babies. I see this work as unethical and dangerous. Just a couple years ago when I published my book GMO Sapiens on potential use of CRISPR in a heritable manner

Why CRISPR baby production (if it happened) was unethical & dangerous Read More »

Is ‘genetically modified human’ a loaded name?

Craig-Mello

Should we be using the term ‘genetically modified human’ in discussions of heritable use of CRISPR in people? During the still ongoing discussions of genetic modification in the human germline and potentially in actual human beings in the future, an interesting, but difficult question has emerged: What words or names would be most appropriate for

Is ‘genetically modified human’ a loaded name? Read More »