patents

Do Patients Have a Fundamental Right to Choice?

right-to-choice-in-medicine

What is the “proper” amount of freedom of choice for patients in medicine? What if the treatments in question are experimental and come with their own baggage of associated risks, personal costs, and potential costs to society? More broadly, do patients have a fundamental right to medical choice? These questions seem particularly appropriate today on […]

Do Patients Have a Fundamental Right to Choice? Read More »

Supreme Court Rejection of WARF hESC Patent Challenge Discussion

james-a.-thomson-214x3001

The challenge to the WARF/Jamie Thomson patents/IP on human embryonic stem cells (hESC) is at an end. The US Supreme Court declined to hear the case. Earlier, the USPTO had turned down the challenge leading to a winding road in the courts. What do you all think of this stem cell IP challenge and the

Supreme Court Rejection of WARF hESC Patent Challenge Discussion Read More »

Challenge of Yamanaka Patent by BioGatekeeper Fails

BioGatekeeper

The still mysterious BioGatekeeper had challenged Yamanaka’s IPS cell patent claiming that it was obvious. The potential implications were huge given the commercial interest in translating IPS cell technology. For background see here, here, and here. There’s pretty much zero information on BioGatekeeper otherwise. Despite the potential seriousness of this patent challenge, just a few days

Challenge of Yamanaka Patent by BioGatekeeper Fails Read More »

Challenge tries to cancel Yamanaka iPS cell patent

Patent-challenge

A new patent dispute has exploded in the stem cell field related to induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells. What’s going on? In 2006, Shinya Yamanaka reported cellular reprogramming to create mouse induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells in Cell and the next year multiple groups along with Yamanaka’s reported creating human iPS cells. It’s no exaggeration

Challenge tries to cancel Yamanaka iPS cell patent Read More »

My message to sellers of dubious stem cell treatments: time to quit

Lawrence-Stowe, stem cell treatments

Over the past year the FDA and FBI have stepped up their actions related to sellers of dubious stem cell treatments. Most recently we have seen arrests of “Drs.” Morales and Stowe as well as others. Mr. Stowe, who is not a medical doctor, remains a fugitive of the FBI. Has the FBI now effectively

My message to sellers of dubious stem cell treatments: time to quit Read More »

Anti-cure impact of Errant EU stem cell patent decision

There has been concern for months about the direction that the European Union was heading in regards to intellectual property (IP) rights and stem cell patent approaches. Now, a definitive decision banning embryonic stem cell (ESC)-based patents by the EU Court has dealt a severe blow to stem cell science in Europe. The European Court

Anti-cure impact of Errant EU stem cell patent decision Read More »