Search Results for: crispr babies

250,000-fold oversight on 3-person IVF mitochondrial transfer?

mitochondrial-genes

Remember the debate over so-called 3-person IVF? The goal of this technology, also referred to as mitochondrial transfer and 3-parent IVF, is to prevent mitochondrial disease through nuclear transfer in oocytes or one-cell embryos. The resulting genetically modified (GM) human embryos and ultimately children if it works could have dodged mitochondrial disease, but also could have serious or […]

250,000-fold oversight on 3-person IVF mitochondrial transfer? Read More »

News bites & rumors on human embryo genetic modification

statment_gene_editing-tech

A lot has happened in the week since the first human embryo genetic modification paper was published by a team led by Junjiu Huang. There have been a number of new events just in the last few days. Jocelyn Kaiser over at SCIENCEINSIDER has a new piece reporting a couple important developments including that the journal

News bites & rumors on human embryo genetic modification Read More »

Hank Greely Human Germline Modification Post

Week-8-Cover

Hank Greely over at The Center for Law and Biosciences at Stanford Law School was one of the participants in the recent Napa meeting on approaches to human germline genetic modification. Hank was also one of the authors on the resulting position paper in Science with David Baltimore as first author (here). Now Hank, pictured below,

Hank Greely Human Germline Modification Post Read More »

Is ‘genetically modified human’ a loaded name?

Craig-Mello

Should we be using the term ‘genetically modified human’ in discussions of heritable use of CRISPR in people? During the still ongoing discussions of genetic modification in the human germline and potentially in actual human beings in the future, an interesting, but difficult question has emerged: What words or names would be most appropriate for

Is ‘genetically modified human’ a loaded name? Read More »

What Would Spock Say About Grouchy ‘Practical Ethics’ Piece on Human Genetic Modification?

kirk-spock-pilot_1

Over at Practical Ethics they are calling for an almost Spock-like, emotion-free, and logical approach to the topic of heritable human genetic modification. Sounds good in principle, right? Well, unfortunately it fails in execution in their essay. The authors of “Editing the germline – a time for reason, not emotion” seem to include Chris Gyngell, Tom

What Would Spock Say About Grouchy ‘Practical Ethics’ Piece on Human Genetic Modification? Read More »

David Baltimore, et al. path for human germline engineering

human-germline-editing-policy

In a new perspectives piece in Science, Nobel Laureate David Baltimore and co-authors including Jennifer Doudna and George Church, chart a potential path forward for human germline engineering. See also accompanying Bioethics piece by Gretchen Vogel as well, “Embryo engineering alarm”. In the piece, entitled “A prudent path forward for genomic engineering and germline gene

David Baltimore, et al. path for human germline engineering Read More »