Search Results for: yamanaka

Why miRNA iPS cells might be the ticket: an A+ paper

Since Yamanaka’s discovery of iPS cells first in mouse and then in human cells 5 years ago, both made using viral transduction, a host of new methods to make iPS cells have been reported.  These methods are quite diverse, ranging from transposons, to recombinant proteins, to plasmids, and to RNA.  Often times these new approaches

Why miRNA iPS cells might be the ticket: an A+ paper Read More »

Who’s who in iPS cells: scientists, journals, funding agencies, countries, and biotechs

Who’s who in the field of iPS cells?  In this post, I examine the people, journals, places, funding agencies, and companies that are the leaders in the iPS cell field. I start with publishing. Last year we did a post on publishing trends in the iPS cell field.  It suggested that the iPS cell field was

Who’s who in iPS cells: scientists, journals, funding agencies, countries, and biotechs Read More »

The Inside Scoop on iPS cells early in 2011

It’s been more than 4 years since Shinya Yamanaka published the remarkable finding that his lab could transform or “reprogram” regular cells called fibroblasts into a very unique state that was quite similar to that of embryonic stem cells (ESC).  Yamanaka called these new cells “iPS cells” for induced pluripotent stem cells. iPS cells Since

The Inside Scoop on iPS cells early in 2011 Read More »

Anonymous stem cell scientist frankly answers questions about the field

Anonymous-scientist-stem-cell-field

Here an anonymous stem cell scientist frankly answers questions about the field in an interview with me. Of course I have to ask you about the recent U.S. court ruling essentially declaring all federal funding of human ES cell work illegal. What’s your take on this? ANSWER: The ruling has so many flaws in it.

Anonymous stem cell scientist frankly answers questions about the field Read More »

Tumorigenicity and Pluripotency teased apart? Not yet for Myc

Fig.-5-Nakagawa-et-al.-Myc-in-cancer-and-IPScs

A paper just came out in PNAS entitled “Promotion of direct reprogramming by transformation-deficient Myc“. The main thrust of this paper is that the tumorigenic and pluripotency-related functions of Myc could be separated. It focused primarily on the lesser studied LMyc. The topic of the intertwined good (pluripotency) and bad (tumorigenicity) functions of Myc, addressed

Tumorigenicity and Pluripotency teased apart? Not yet for Myc Read More »