Search Results for: stap

Perspectives on final RIKEN report on STAP cell scandal & what comes next

STAP-cells-FIgure

The Japanese research institute RIKEN has come full circle in a way on the STAP cell scandal. Note that the STAP papers included not only authors from RIKEN, but also from Brigham and Women’s Hospital/Harvard Medical School. With its final report released today (also a powerpoint of images were released including the one showing a […]

Perspectives on final RIKEN report on STAP cell scandal & what comes next Read More »

Obokata Can’t Reproduce STAP Cells

Obokata-press-conference

Signaling a nightmare ending to what was originally a fairy tale scientific story, the Japanese press (e.g. here) are reporting that Haruko Obokata has herself been unable to make STAP cells again as part of a RIKEN team testing STAP under watchful supervision. In advance of a scheduled RIKEN press conference tomorrow, newspapers including Asahi Shimbun are

Obokata Can’t Reproduce STAP Cells Read More »

STAP cell 2.0? New stem cell paper controversy ready to erupt

STAP2.0

Did you eventually get sick of the whole STAP mess and all the baggage that came with it? Stay tuned for STAP 2.0 or perhaps I should say STAP junior. Just as STAP is starting to fade a bit from our radar screens, there is unfortunately a new very problematic stem cell paper situation coming soon

STAP cell 2.0? New stem cell paper controversy ready to erupt Read More »

STAP cells Voted as the Stem Cell Story of the Year for 2014

Stem-Cell-Story-of-2014

When I asked the readers of this blog what they felt was the biggest stem cell story of 2014 in a poll, they overwhelmingly picked the STAP cell scandal. For background on STAP you can toggle through the many STAP cell pieces on this blog here, see a STAP timeline, and a STAP image gallery. Basically,

STAP cells Voted as the Stem Cell Story of the Year for 2014 Read More »

Harvard STAP cell authors release new protocol, affirm belief in phenomenon

STAP-stem-cells

Even as everyone was going through the Science and Nature reviews of the rejected STAP papers this week, something else on the STAP front that happened last week. What’s up? Well, the STAP Nature papers are retracted, RIKEN CDB is going to be reorganized, RIKEN CDB has tried at least 22 times to make STAP

Harvard STAP cell authors release new protocol, affirm belief in phenomenon Read More »

STAP papers blistered by Nature’s own reviewers were then accepted

STAP-magic

The reviews of a STAP paper submitted to and rejected by the journal Science in 2012 were posted at Retraction Watch yesterday. They filled in some gaps in the puzzle of the series of events that led to such flawed science being published in Nature in January 2014, but the reviews also raised more questions. Today, more STAP paper

STAP papers blistered by Nature’s own reviewers were then accepted Read More »

Full Reviews of Rejected STAP Paper Point to Early Signs of Big Trouble

Before the two STAP cell papers were published in Nature in January of 2014, much of the same data was reportedly submitted as single papers to other high-profile journals including Science. In these cases, the proto-STAP papers as we might call them were rejected. But why? Until now we largely could only speculate. However, the reviews

Full Reviews of Rejected STAP Paper Point to Early Signs of Big Trouble Read More »