July 12, 2020

The Niche

Knoepfler lab stem cell blog

The dangerous myth of email privacy: a lesson from scientists who were spied on by the FDA

A major scandal has erupted further regarding FDA monitoring of its scientists’ emails as reported by the NY Times.

The FDA spied on the emails of its own scientists and other scientists. Some of the emails also involved correspondence with Congress and even the White House.

Regardless of one’s position on what the FDA did, the hullaballoo highlights the danger of one of the most common myths in the world: that emails are private.

Emails are not private.

No matter what anyone says, thinks or hopes, email is not a private form of communication.

I for one imagine my emails as quite boring or even soporific in general, but that doesn’t mean I want any old bozo reading them.

Scientists think that email is private though, when without almost any exceptions it isn’t.

Assuming most scientists are employed, essentially all are subject to email monitoring by their employers where the employer is a government agency or private company.

This goes well-beyond scientists, of course, to anyone emailing while at work.

I know many people who send private emails while at work, but for that purpose they use a Gmail or Yahoo account…however those are not necessarily more private for a variety of reasons. For example, Yahoo reportedly just had almost 1/2 million email user passwords stolen a few days ago. Google has a mixed track record of privacy and just agreed to pay a greater than $20 million USD fine for privacy violations.

The bottom line is that anything you send via email, regardless of where you send it or via which account, may not be private. Of course certain pathways such as emailing at work decrease privacy dramatically, but it is wisest to use extra caution whenever emailing. This is not paranoia, but rather simple common sense.

%d bloggers like this: