Kevin McCormack, Sr. Director of Public Communications and Patient Advocate Outreach at CIRM, described the contest in, appropriately enough, a speech. As best as I can tell 56 scientists participated.
The speech cannot be longer 30 seconds.
You can see the speeches on YouTube at #SciencePitch. Note that the majority of the candidate speeches are way over 30 seconds.
For me, those pitches shouldn’t be in the running since they are too long. Call me a stickler, but an elevator speech must be super short. So I only considered those speeches that were 31 seconds or shorter for my top 3. Still there were some longer ones that were pretty cool.
You’ll also note that some of the talks were (in my opinion) overly produced to include fancy graphics, text, even sounds effects, etc.
I also disqualify those (sorry, USCKeck) for the purpose of choosing my favorite because the point of an elevator pitch is that the scientist must give their 30 seconds without any fancy props or anything.
I also like enthusiasm in elevator speeches, so monotone, emotionless delivery is a no-no. Conversely there were a few otherwise good ones where the scientist was so excited they were almost yelling into the camera. That’s too much, especially in an elevator!
So which ones would I choose?
Below are my favorite 3 elevator speeches, starting with my #1 favorite.
#1, Jonathan Lam, UCLA
#2, Anjana Nityanandam, Scripps Research Institute
#3, Stefano Da Sacco, CHLA
Some other favorites (including some that didn’t quite follow the rules).
Jeanne Loring, Scripps
Michael Rothenberg, Stanford
Andrew Goldstein, UCLA
Amy Sprowles, Humboldt State University
Ron Piran, Sanford-Burnham