Can you make a synthetic embryo, also called an embryo model?
Developmental biologist Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz has long been on the trail of this seemingly almost uncatchable quarry.
With her team’s publication in Science today they took a big step forward on this path even if some major hurdles remain. You can see her discussion of the research in the YouTube video above along with interesting comments from her graduate student, Sarah Harrison who was the first author. Congrats to both.
The paper, Harrison, et al, is entitled “Assembly of embryonic and extra-embryonic stem cells to mimic embryogenesis in vitro”. The murine embryo-like structures are referred to as ETS-embryos since they are derived from both Embryonic stem cells and Trophoblast Stem cells.
The potential applications of this artificial ETS-embryo technology moving forward are broad, but there are some limits to the current version of the method. For instance, not all germ layers are represented. New Scientist quoted Robin Lovell-Badge about these limitations:
“Robin Lovell-Badge at the Francis Crick Institute in London says that the embryos lack two other types of cell layer required to develop the bodies’ organs: ectoderm, which forms skin and the central nervous system, and endoderm, which makes our internal organs.”
The team hopes to address that with future versions.
Could one ever create ‘real” living mouse embryos this way?
From New Scientist:
“We’re not planning to make a mouse in the lab using stem cells,” says Zernicka-Goetz. But she is hopeful that adding yolk sac stem cells will allow these artificial embryos to survive long enough to study the beginnings of organs like the heart.”
Another provocative open question that Harrison calls “the elephant in the room” in the video is whether this type of technology could work with human cells to make human embryo-like structures. If that is possible, a great deal of innovative research could be catalyzed, but of course huge ethical questions would emerge along the way. Harrison highlighted differences in mouse and human embryogenesis that could also be a challenge.
Of course one can more simply make early embryos through IVF, but a new perhaps tractable system like ETS-embryos may enable more flexible studies involving use CRISPR for instance. Would it bypass ethical concerns in the human context if someone went down that path? It all depends on how one defines an embryo.
Disclosure: Cell Guidance Systems, an advertiser on this blog, has licensed the embryo technology and conducted the interview in the video, but this is not a sponsored post.
1 thought on “Synthetic embryo or embryo model tech reported in Science: how big is this?”
Huh? I understood about five percent of this. Maybe that’s enough, but it doesn’t feel like it is, you know? I mean, I get the idea, I think that what is being said here is the the scientists are looking for the answer to how a stem cell can be created that has the characteristics of a natural stem cell but will not be viable, therefore presumably more ethical. However, my technical vocabulary lives in the world of music rather than chemistry and biology. Can it be explained in simpler terms? I want to be a vocal advocate. I’m rather aggressively striving to understand this on a deeper level, but you lose the average Joe like me as soon as you begin using the scientific jargon. Give me a term of a process I should look into or keeping an eye out for. As a larger community, I think we need to bring in a middleman who can speak both languages. I have many unanswered questions.I believe I represent a public that is or would be extremely excited about this science. I appreciate the consequences of this research, but I’m unable to be an effective advocate when I don’t quite understand how close we are to a breakthrough, or what those breakthroughs being searched out for even are.
Comments are closed.