Weekly reads: Chinese CRISPR biotechs, cultured meat war, MSCs for Alzheimer’s

Chinese CRISPR research continues to grow and this includes interesting CRISPR biotech firms. Some here in the U.S. worry that American gene editing firms could be lagging behind. Especially over the past year, investors and even some scientists have voiced frustration.

U.S. gene editing firms like Editas have been struggling for years. Its stock is down 93% over the past 5 years. CRISPR Therapeutics has had a pretty solid past 5 years but is substantially down more recently. Can they turn things around? What other CRISPR biotechs or stocks are you following?

What’s going on in China with gene editing?

HuidaGene Therapeutics, Chinese CRISPR biotech
HuidaGene Therapeutics is a notable Chinese CRISPR biotech. This is a firm image summarizing its pipeline.

Chinese CRISPR biotechs

STAT News recently published: These 12 Chinese companies are poised to transform CRISPR gene-editing. Are regulations or research investments in China substantially different for gene editing than in the U.S.?

Hui Yang, a leader of one of the 12 firms, HuidaGene Therapeutics, is a name that rang a bell for me. I think it’s the same person I remember from the past. He was someone who at one point seemed potentially interested in doing human germline CRISPR. Maybe the article quoting him five years ago was incorrect.

The dynamic between U.S. and Chinese CRISPR biotechs is on people’s minds. From STAT:

“In many areas, Chinese companies have been more aggressive, pushing into diseases that their U.S. counterparts have shied away from, including in Duchenne muscular dystrophy and herpes virus. That willingness has raised eyebrows among some executives and academics in the U.S., while exciting others who fear the American regulators and companies have been too conservative.

However, in other areas, the U.S. remains ahead, as is the case with beta thalassemia, for which Vertex Pharmaceuticals and CRISPR Therapeutics secured the first approval of a treatment. Nonetheless, Chinese companies like Yoltech Therapeutics are pioneering in vivo gene-editing therapies for beta thalassemia, hoping to offer a cost-effective and quicker alternative to existing treatments.”

More regenerative reads

stem cell stocks
Stem cell stocks from 12 years ago.

Blast from the past: 2013 stem cell stocks

This blast from the past is not an article but an image of a stem cell stock ticker from late 2013. How many of these are still around and go by the same name? StemCells Inc. is long gone. Geron doesn’t have an ES cell program these days. Pluristem is now Pluri. Athersys is gone. Aastrom became Vericel.

I’ve got a more recent list of stem cell stocks I’ve been following. I’m following them for various non-investment-related reasons. I don’t have any investments in them or others right now.

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Be the first to know about the latest developments in stem cell and regenerative medicine research.

6 thoughts on “Weekly reads: Chinese CRISPR biotechs, cultured meat war, MSCs for Alzheimer’s”

  1. Inga Andersdotter

    It seems like the real question is this: How will the massive and ongoing destruction of science in the US affect all of this research and development? There is sheer contempt, hatred, and terror of science in this country. Can China and other countries pick up the slack? Can these desperately needed therapies be developed overseas if the US is going to keep devolving into the medieval era? At this point, all I care about is if the work gets done somewhere.

    1. I disagree with the FDA on many issues, but these are all concerns about the details of their policies. I do agree strongly with the agency’s overall demand for rigorous science and ethical treatment of patients. Innovation requires bravery, but not at the cost of endangering or misleading patients. Because of serving on a science and ethics board for a Gates Foundation-supported pluripotent stem cell project in China, I gained some insight into the Chinese regulatory system. My impression is that there is far less oversight of medical products, so no, I would not trust China to insure scientific rigor in development of regenerative medicines.

  2. Paul,
    I admire your blog and eagerly wait for each edition.
    However your commentary on MSCs and Alzheimers has many factual inaccuracies.
    You are regarded as a leading voice in the scientific field and media regarding stem cells. You cannot afford to make these errors as the public values your opinion.
    I would love to discuss MSCs and their legitimate role with yoy if you are interested.
    Regards
    Dr. Atluri

Leave a Reply