The protocol is based on a solid foundation of pre-clinical animal studies:
“Researchers at the National Eye Institute (NEI) are launching a clinical trial to test the safety of a novel patient-specific stem cell-based therapy to treat geographic atrophy, the advanced “dry” form of age-related macular degeneration (AMD), a leading cause of vision loss among people age 65 and older. The geographic atrophy form of AMD currently has no treatment.
“The protocol, which prevented blindness in animal models, is the first clinical trial in the U.S. to use replacement tissues from patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC),” said Kapil Bharti, Ph.D., a senior investigator and head of the NEI Ocular and Stem Cell Translational Research Section.”
While work has been slowly ongoing in Japan using IPS cell based RPE products for macular degeneration, there hasn’t been much action elsewhere. This new clinical is the 1st of its kind in the U.S. and an important milestone.
Notably, although work in Japan has been focused for years on using allogeneic (donor) IPS cells, the new US study will use the patients’ own IPS cells and hence is autologous, lowering the chance of rejection.
Bharti’s team had a cool JCI paper this year on deep learning related to this project (see Fig. 4a above).
You can watch a video about the new trial below.
The NEI study will begin with a dozen patients and I was glad to see that safety is mentioned as a focus:
“Under the phase I/IIa clinical trial protocol 12 patients with advanced-stage geographic atrophy will receive the iPSC-derived RPE implant in one of their eyes and be closely monitored for a period of at least one year to confirm safety.
A concern with any stem cell-based therapy is its oncogenic potential: the ability for cells to multiply uncontrollably and form tumors. In animal models, the researchers genetically analyzed the iPSC-derived RPE cells and found no mutations linked to potential tumor growth.”
The work in Japan on a few patients has also not reported any tumor growth from IPS cell-based RPE therapies so far.
Overall, I see rigorous stem cell-based approaches as promising for various kinds of vision loss affecting different parts of the eye.
Keep in mind that something very different is going on out there too, which should be distinguished from the news discussed above. Some unproven stem cell clinics and others lacking robust preclinical data have claimed that purported stem cell product injections could help vision loss, but what they’re selling doesn’t clearly work and has in certain cases done great harm.